However, through that time I still argued that 35mm full frame was still a small format. It’s a tiny ass little itty bitty format when you compare it to the other formats of photography out today. The thing that I would first consider is depth of field. Medium format then gives you a look and feel that can’t be achieved in smaller formats. You go shoot a portrait with a large format camera, nail that exposure, nail that print… You are cheating yourself out of something mystical, magical, and a royal pain in the ass. He’s still traveling the world with large format cameras and film and all the PITA stuff that goes with that. I didn’t think that full frame was better just based on size. Some of the trolls out there are going to think this is a Fuji sponsored message. While Fuji is a client of mine and I have done work for them they sure as hell don’t keep food on my table or a roof over my head on any sort of regular basis. The larger the sensor, the shallower the depth of field you get at a given aperture. Photography is art and science and you need to have a foot planted in each of those to be a well-rounded photographer. Here’s what I know: Aperture, focal length, camera to subject distance, and sensor size ALL play a role in depth of field. That’s why I study the likes of Avedon and Mary Ellen Mark and Dan Winters; it’s because of all their gorgeous math. Take a photo with your DSLR at f1.8 and then take the same shot with your cell phone. You are currently standing on the shoulders of many a large format photographer. It gives you a whole new perspective on DSLR photography. You’ll appreciate the speed and agility the 35mm or whatever gives you but you’ll realize how much you are missing as well. You’ll be thankful for your Canon or Nikon or Fuji but you will know there is something out there in the photographic world that it just can’t touch. His coverage of the Olympics with that old Speed Graphic is fantastic and unlike anything other photographers were shooting there. I guess if your name isn’t Greg or Gregory you just need to stick with small format stuff. Cary is a photographer’s photographer and shoots just about every format known to man. Here we have three shots that are basically the same frame shot with three different focal lengths and you can clearly see the difference in the depth of field.
Let’s look at three different sensor sizes and their equivalent lenses that would give the same field of view. The equivalent field of view lens on a 1.5 crop factor Fuji is the 56mm. Which one has the most effect on the changes in depth of field?
Field of view is way different than depth of field. Then I’ll add the micro 4/3’s Panasonic GH4 to the mix with the Panasonic/Leica 42.5mm lens. It is my contention (and argument and hypothesis) that focal length is causing the greatest change in what we’re seeing. The wider the lens, the deeper, or longer the depth of field. Look at the same 85mm lens on a full frame D3 and then on the Fuji APS crop sensor.
You don't have to be a registered member to video chat live, but you can register for a free account for many added benefits such as unlimited messages, private webcam chat, reseved nickname, members only room access, and much more!
There are many Chatroulette alternatives out there like Omegle, Stickam, Tinychat, Chatrandom, Imeetzu, Bazoocam, Wocchat, Tipitty, as well as many other , but Chat Ville really delivers a better experience in less time.
Our team designed as a unique alternative to Chatroulette with only sexy women and it is totally free to use and there are hundreds of real ladies.